A more transparent statement?
Please leave your comments below, and/or pass a link of this blog post to others who may find this of interest. Regardless of your views of the content, this is a suggested format that the original letter could have been posted to add more transparency by providing robust statistics on members views of sensitive/controversial topics, such as climate change. Such topics have a potential impact on the public. Note that for illustration purposes the statistical data is purely ficticious. What are your thoughts? ___________________________________________________________________________________________ “ More than 70,000 scientists and science teachers are represented in an open letter warning that 'intelligent design' should not be taught in school science classes. The letter was published in major Australian newspapers on 21 October 2005. ” [Statistics: 8.7% of members responded with their views on this question; 54% agreeing with the statement; 38% disagreeing and 8% neutral] ...